A more intuitive formulation of Bayes theorem
There’s a lot to say about Bayes theorem. And most of it’s been said. In my little echo chamber of the internet, just about every YouTuber that I watch or blogger that I read has talked about Bayes theorem. So the critical question is: what do I have to add?
Just this for now. Almost every introduction to Bayes theorem introduces the formula like so:
I think the reason that this formulation is so common is that when you
want to use Bayes theorem, you’re probably trying to compute
However, I’d argue that an introduction to a topic should prioritize giving the reader an intuition for why the formula is true. If possible, the reader should come away thinking that it’s so obvious that it’s almost uninteresting. I think the following formulation does a better job at that.
Derivation
One way to compute the probability of two events
To make this concrete, let’s say
From there it’s a small leap to notice that
And the very last step is to combine the two equations:
Divide each side by
I think this route to deriving Bayes theorem makes the connection to